Note: This post has been amended (see the end) to include information requested by an overwhelming number of the readers. Thanks for your interest!
I am frequently asked, "What can I do to improve my chances of getting hired as a research analyst?" Beyond the obvious — become a CFA charterholder — there are a number of other steps that aspiring analysts may take.
Making the Intangible Tangible
What an aspiring analyst has to offer to an employer are largely abstract- and creative-thinking skills. These skills are intangible and difficult for recruiters to assess. This is one reason why firms in finance tend to recruit from the same schools decade after decade: rigor of the curriculum and reliably high quality candidates. This is also why those without experience in the investment industry find it hard to get hired for research analyst positions. That is, in the absence of other evidence, firms hire what they think they can depend on — that is, what is tangible: your education and your experience.
But do not despair if you have not gone to your country's top educational institution or if you have no experience! I went to the University of Colorado (not a top school for finance recruiters) and had very little experience when I was hired as a research analyst at one of the largest and best-known US money managers.
What employers really want is for your intangible skills to be made tangible. This realization empowers you tremendously, because with this framework, you can focus on providing concrete evidence that you have the skills necessary for being an effective analyst. When I began my career I created a personal website that included: examples of my own personal research analysis on companies; book reviews of economics, finance, and investment texts that demonstrated my ability to think critically about information; and an extended version of my CV (i.e., greater than the orthodox one-page maximum), so human resources departments could see if I had what it took to be a research analyst.
By engaging in these activities it will also sharpen your own skill set. For example, when I created my own research reports — which I highly encourage you to do — I used only primary data sources, such as company annual reports. I also did all of my own calculations for things like future gross domestic product (GDP), the future shape of the yield curve, and the cost of capital.
Recognize that your opinion matters. Companies will be hiring you for your opinion as much as for your skill set. They hire you with the expectation that you will take responsibility for your choices. So, if you choose to make your intangible skills tangible by creating your own research reports then you must track how your investment recommendations do by noting the prices of assets on the day that you recommended them for purchase and then track how they perform over time. You must be honest with yourself, otherwise you won't learn anything. This is more for you than for your future employer. (Though it certainly wouldn't look good for you to get caught fudging the numbers in even a theoretical exercise.) Markets provide a valuable feedback mechanism for assessing your skill set. The beautiful and terrifying thing about investment management is that the results of your performance are measured objectively. You either did well for people or you did not. So, if you are not doing very well, then you need to identify where your analysis broke down, and then strive to improve.
I have a friend who took a similar approach as me to getting work. He sent his research reports to investment firms every single month for two years and eventually got a job interview. By doing this process he taught himself to be an analyst.
Look for a Mentor
Across the globe, CFA Institute has scores of local societies, which are made up of many generous individuals, many of whom may be willing to guide your career track. If that does not appeal, then contact money managers whose process is in alignment with your own. You may be intimidated, but the worst they can say is "no." In any case, any possible anxiety you experience in approaching investment heroes is good practice for the anxiety you may experience in approaching management of prospective businesses, some of whom may include the likes of Rupert Murdoch or Li Ka-Shing.
Analysis Is Probably Not What You Think It Is
Most analysts — the aspiring and the experienced — think that investing is about facts, models, mathematics, and analysis. Yet, as I discuss extensively in my own book, The Intuitive Investor, there is no such thing as a future fact. Facts, by definition, are things that occurred in the past. Yet investing results unfold in the future. What this means is that investing is as much a creative and intuitive process as it is an analytical process. To be a well-rounded and experienced candidate you need to be able to think in a balanced fashion — that is, both analytically and creatively. Therefore, engage in activities that enhance your creativity, too. For me, I am an active meditator, as well as an artist. Your success as an analyst will depend on your ability to synthesize information and to see things no one else is seeing. After all, by definition, if you want to earn returns that no one else is earning, you have to do things that no one else is doing.
Stock Your Mental Toolkit
Another tip is to read, read, read, read. Read investment texts. Read texts on geopolitics. Read texts on mergers and acquisitions. Read economic texts. Read anything that sparks your curiosity, even fiction (potent advice from Tom Brakke, CFA). And most of all, read the news, from many sources every single day, and begin to develop an opinion about the news and how it affects different countries, industries, businesses, and individuals. The most important skill for any investor is: understanding information. He who understands information the best does better, and he who understands information the best and acts decisively on that information wins the day. When I was an aspiring analyst if I encountered a piece of news I did not understand, I would read not just the article in question, but also an entire academic paper or book on the subject. I did this day after day, month after month, and year after year until my mental mosaic became large.
So let your ignorance guide you. What you do not know and understand should inform what you try and learn next.
Introspection
Spend some time figuring out who you are as an analyst. This is critically important. Why? If your natural strengths as a thinker make you a good trader, then you will be very frustrated working at a deep value, long-term focused money management firm. Likewise, if your character is more in line with a long-term, deliberate process, then you will likely be frustrated at a high-frequency trading (HFT) shop. You want to know yourself so that you can make an informed decision about where you want to work, about what type of analysis works in accord with your mind, and about where to spend huge parts of your life.
Furthermore, your introspective process will allow you to take an inventory of your innate strengths and weaknesses — and we all have both. You want to develop skills that accentuate your existing talents and skills that compensate for your shortcomings, too.
Be Patient
Expect this entire process to take a lot of time. From the time I first had the idea to become a research analyst to the time I got hired doing the work I wanted to do, it took me five years. For some people it is a much shorter process. But then, having done all of the work I described above, once hired, I was promoted to portfolio manager in two short years and was fortunate enough (and maybe skilled enough) to have retired at age 35.
Best wishes for success!
If you liked this post, don't forget to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.
Update: Many of you in the comments section have requested a link to an example research report. When I began my career I got a copy of a brokerage report from my local market and then used it as the basis for my own report. I am going to point those interested in what a research report looks like to Zacks.com.
All posts are the opinion of the author. As such, they should not be construed as investment advice, nor do the opinions expressed necessarily reflect the views of CFA Institute or the author’s employer.
Image credit: ©Getty Images/TommL
Professional Learning for CFA Institute Members
CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report professional learning (PL) credits earned, including content on Enterprising Investor. Members can record credits easily using their online PL tracker.
If you liked this post, don’t forget to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.
All posts are the opinion of the author. As such, they should not be construed as investment advice, nor do the opinions expressed necessarily reflect the views of CFA Institute or the author’s employer. Image credit: ©Getty Images / Ascent / PKS Media Inc.
Professional Learning for CFA Institute Members
CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report professional learning (PL) credits earned, including content on Enterprising Investor. Members can record credits easily using their online PL tracker.
410 Comments
Hi
Great Article. I am looking at becoming an equity analyst. One problem I have is writing detailed research report. I tend to get a mental block and struggle with structuring the report. The flow of ideas do not come naturally to me when it comes to writing reports. Are you able to suggest some ideas as to what should be included in the reports? Do you have a framework in mind when it comes to writing research reports?
Regards
Kamal
Hello Kamal,
Thank you for reaching out, I am happy to hear that you thought the this piece was great!
It is hard for me to attest to what your local market may include in a research report. However, here in North America the research report usually takes on the following approximate format:
* Page 1: Analyst's opinion of "buy - hold - sell." Current stock price. A one paragraph summary of the report and/or three to five bullet points highlighting the major data supporting the case. Missing from many research reports, but a sign of a sophisticated report is the analyst disclosing the time frame for which the analysis is assumed to be relevant. Here I am not talking about a "one year price target." Instead I am suggesting the analyst says, "The story of XYZ company is at least a three year story, see 'company overview' section to see why."
* Industry overview section: Here the analyst describes the industry the business operates within, as well as how that industry typically performs in different economic cycles.
* Company overview section: Here the analyst compares the business to other companies in the industry along the important variables unique to the industry. Next, the analyst highlights how the specific business under consideration is different than the other in the industry. Huge emphasis should be placed on competitive advantages. The analyst should also discuss the embedded time horizon assumption of the analyst.
* Valuation of the business. Analysts should model the performance of the business under various economic scenarios and discuss the key assumptions of the model. Excerpting the model in the report is key so that others can assess the quality of the work.
* The analyst's opinion of the business.
This report is typically 15-30 pages depending on the complexity of the report. Such a lengthy format provides you with ample opportunity to demonstrate your full skill set. Further, it gives the prospective employer tangible proof of your knowledge and skills.
Do not overlook the suggestion I made in the blog post. Above I recommended that aspiring analysts call a brokerage firm in their local markets and ask for a sample research report. This can serve as a template for your own work. As always, DO YOUR OWN WORK. This last point may seem obvious, but my colleagues and I have all encountered analysts plagiarizing the work of other companies in their own analysis.
Best wishes for success!
Jason
Hi Jason
Thank you for this well written article . I do like your writing style & topic selection. with respect to the reading list you shared, I found many editions and the edition you recommend I guess written in 1996.
Financial Management: Theory and Practice; Brigham and Gapenski; Dryden
do you recommend this edition in specific or other editions suffice.
Regards,
Hello Mohammed,
Thank you so much for your praise and for your question. In answer to you, I have only read the 1996 edition so can only testify to its quality. However, several other people have bought other editions and have told me that they are very similar. I can only imagine that the quality of the material has gotten better over the many intervening years. If you are considering a new edition try and make sure that it has the excellent discussion of "additional funds needed" analysis. There are many other important lessons in the book, but this is an extremely valuable one.
Best wishes for success!
Jason
Hi Jason,
I have two questions -
Is it easy to retire at 35, particularly after putting in the hard work and efforts to get the CFA charter and the various job? Don't you feel a vaccum and have a feeling of not being gainfully productive whilst still being young?
What would you advise someone with CPA and CFA professional qualifications, who has spent 15+ years in financial reporting and controller ship and wants to make a move to the investment field?
Hi Sam,
Thank you for your questions.
Retiring was one of the hardest decisions of my entire life. I am not sure in retrospect whether or not I would have done anything any differently. When I retired at 35 (I am now 44) I had literally dozens of important things I wanted to accomplish. I have many varied interests, and portfolio management is only one of those interests. Most days of my retirement were spent exercising, writing, studying, or traveling. There were very few unproductive days. It is the nature of productive people that they do productive things no matter the setting. Or at least that has been my experience. All of that said, retiring was certainly a difficult experience for the first 2-3 months. Primarily I didn't realize how much of my identity was connected to being an investment manager. To go from world-beater finance pro to person whose opinion no one cares about was initially a challenge. But the freedom you have to determine the outcome of every day far outweighs this minor hurdle.
As for your second question...I am not sure how to authentically answer that question as I have never been in that situation or known anyone in that situation. I will say that your qualifications - credentials and experience - put you leagues ahead of most candidates. The question that people in an investment management capacity will have about you are: can he invest and does he have the temperament to invest? You can address the first issue by creating your own investment reports. This will serve as tangible proof of your skill set. It will also help you to identify any gaps in your understanding. The temperament question is a more difficult one to address. You either have "it" or you do not have "it." But that same thing is true for those who have spent their careers as research analysts. As I discuss in my own book, "The Intuitive Investor" the difference between an analyst and a portfolio manager is the difference between aiming a gun and firing it. The full burden of responsibility is on the PM's shoulders. Many analysts never get to the point where they are comfortable pulling the trigger. Last, I will quote one of my favorite homilies to you: the squeaky hinge gets the grease. If you are interested in a research position and you have the background that you have described (which is highly desirable) then tell someone at your firm or another firm that this is your interest. Do you belong to a CFA Society where you can network with other pros and let them know your interest?
With smiles,
Jason
Hi Jason,
When you say networking with others in CFA society, I have a concern. I find that CFA society has very limited resources to the CFA candidates. The local society only accept CFA charter holder. For people who are still on the way to attain the charter, the only networking opportunity is discussions round the exams-learning material, exam preparation. For people who have passed the exams will have no intersts in those stuff. In fact, as we want to set foot in the area, we would like the opportunities to get to know more people already in the circle. However,I can't see such support from CFA society. The situation is people who are already in the circle tend to have more solidarity via the CFA society, whereas people who are outside the circle are casted off and see few chances to merge into the investment profession's group.
Another question is how to make myself known by the potential recruiters. Follow your advices, I have started to write my own research report. I selected a few companies and did in-depth analysis( the companies I selected don't have anything in common, not in the same industry, not in the same geographic region, not sweepingly high dividends stock, nor growth stock- could be either style. The only thing in common is that I believe they are good choices for value investors). I create my blog. The problem is how I can let other people, particularly the potential recruiters know? Do you have any suggestions on how to market myself?
Thanks, Jason.
Cheers,
Ruthy
Hi Ruthy,
I am sorry to hear that your experience with your local Society has not been beneficial. It is very difficult for me to give advice that works in every situation as there are very large cultural differences across countries. For example, in the United States it is considered appropriate for those wanting to advance their careers to approach more established professionals to seek mentoring and advice. I am not sure where you are living, but it may be that the culture where you live is very different.
If I were you at this point I would research investment professionals in your home country whose opinion you respect and contact them to ask for mentoring, or begin sending copies of your research reports along with a cover letter introducing yourself and letting them know why you are sending the report to them; and, of course, include a copy of your CV. Try asking for feedback on your research reports from old professors of yours from school. You might also ask some of the more established professionals to critique your research reports.
This process can take a very long time. In my case it took nearly 5 years from the moment I decided I wanted to be a research analyst until I was hired into that position.
Best wishes for success!
Jason
Hi Jason,
I am just going to join a new job which is related to in house construction for its group companies. MY job profile is basically more into feasibility studies of that projects. Please can you let me know which analytical skills should i start working on that will help me succeed in my new job.
Thank You.
Kind Regards,
Jay
Hi Jay,
Unfortunately, I don't have a lot of experience with the skills needed for the job function you describe above. However, in general, you would want to have an expert knowledge of corporate finance. My favorite corporate finance book is Financial Management: Theory and Practice, Eighth Edition. Though, I am told subsequent editions are very similar.
Best wishes for success!
Jason