On the heels of the success of my blog post on how to become a research analyst, I have been writing a monthly series on the skills that truly separate you from the crowd once you have your coveted research analyst position. Thus far I've written about introspection and creativity. This month we'll take a look at a skill I believe is highly undervalued: intuition.
Intuition
I think Daniel Kahneman sets intuition up as a straw man for his behavioral economics theories. In his well-received book Thinking, Fast and Slow, of which I am a fan, he associates intuition with “System 1” thinking which, he says, is “fast thinking,” characterized by snap assessments of situations, subconscious thinking, and thoughts processed in the brain’s amygdala. Kahneman holds up “System 2” thinking as the opposite. It is “slow thinking,” characterized by deep analysis and processed in the prefrontal cortex.
I submit, however, that he associates the wrong word with System 1 thinking. It should not be intuition but instinct that is Kahneman’s descriptor for System 1 thinking. In fact, no less an authority on the meaning of words than the Oxford English Dictionary* defines intuition as:
Direct perception of truth, fact, etc., independent of any reasoning process; immediate apprehension.
An alternative definition, also from the OED, is:
Pure, untaught, noninferential knowledge.
Note the words "apprehension" and "noninferential knowledge," which suggest, not a gut-level response, but a flash of brilliance.
But it is not just dictionaries that view intuition differently. In a 2013 presentation at the Battle of the Quants, Emanuel Derman, whom many consider the grandfather of quantitative finance, pointed out that the foundations of science itself are the result of intuitive processes. He specifically pointed to Johannes Kepler, Sir Isaac Newton, André-Marie Ampère, James Clerk Maxwell, Albert Einstein, and Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac as scientists that had experienced immediate apprehensions and flashes of noninferential knowledge that advanced science in meaningful ways. These flashes of brilliance stand in stark contrast to both Kahneman’s System 1 and System 2 thinking.
I describe intuition in my book, The Intuitive Investor, as tuning into the cosmic radio station. In similar language, Derman says of intuition, “The observer becomes so close to the object (or person) observed that he begins to experience their existence from both outside and inside them. Intuition is a merging of the observer with the observed.” In both cases, intuition requires deliberation, despite the ultimate “eureka moment.”
But why is any of this important to investment management?
One of the conditions of intuitive insight is an unbiased, unattached mind — one free from the preferences, prejudices, and emotional constraints associated with the amygdala. It turns out that the ability to apprehend, comprehend, and resonate with the truth of the universe as closely as is possible is exactly the discounting process that every analyst is charged with fulfilling.
Remedy
The key to developing intuition is stripping away autonomic emotional responses and attuning oneself to a state of no-mind. Again, these are the very fruits of a healthy introspective and mindfulness/meditation practice.
Application
Intuition is a skill with endless applications. It was my intuition that led me to publicly call the 9 March 2009 S&P 500 market low on 12 March 2009. Using meditation, I felt that most market participants were no longer anxious to the point of nausea, and instead were exhausted and spent. This was at a time of high emotional paranoia and forecasts of the end times. But using the power of my mind, I was able to strip away the autonomic emotional responses of the amygdala and attune to a state of no-mind. In that deep meditative state, I was able to see the world differently and to make a very different call from many other market participants.
*The Compact Oxford English Dictionary New Edition, 1992.
Please note that the content of this site should not be construed as investment advice, nor do the opinions expressed necessarily reflect the views of CFA Institute.
Photo credit: ©iStockphoto.com/CSA-Images
14 Comments
Ah, your comments about intellect misleading is when we make intellect inelastic. Does not intuition assure that our intellect is more elastic to guide us when discounted cash flow versus vs p/e is more appropriate.... Is it not only about the vehicle, but about other factors, e.g. time (where we are in the cycle)that determines which evaluation method will be closer to the truth. Thank you for your engagement and the articles as well. Lots of food for thought.
Hi Maria,
I agree entirely with your thoughts above. I have written previously about the power of intuition to inform choice; which financial model and when, for example. Again, thanks for your enthusiasm for the post and for the topic!
With smiles,
Jason
Jason,
Love the series!
Intuition: to be able to judge the truth of a matter absolutely and not relatively. From my own experience, if one is not conscious of the power of intuition, then it becomes much easier to dismiss any such "Eureka!" moment or to chalk up a decision or action to mere luck (if hindsight proves that one's feeling of a situation, matter, stock, management team, etc., was ultimately right). My advice to those that are of this mindset is to carefully track the performance of all of their investment ideas (not just the ones that become part of one's portfolio) and record those seemingly amorphous feelings about each one, beyond financial characteristics and other "hard" data. I believe there's a high probability of a positive correlation between performance and one's intuited response to each.
For those that are still skeptical, I would only underscore that intuition and right-brained processes are only half of the equation; no one is advocating abandoning financial analysis, accounting, etc. It may be symptomatic of Western education to only consider the extremes of the spectrum, but investing is a field that requires innate balance in all aspects. If numbers were all that mattered, then a whole lot of investment professionals will be replaced by machines in short order.
Looking forward to the next article :-)
Regards,
Ben
Hi Ben,
Thanks very much for the praise; I am pleased that you "love the series!" But thank you even more for your insights on intuition...in fact, I don't have a single quibble with anything you wrote and I think you have added meaningfully to the discussion. You may also be interested in an article I wrote (featured in Barron's no less) that is very similar to your suggestion of recording one's "seemingly amorphous feelings about each" possible investment. Here is a link to that article, How to Measure Your Success as an Investor: http://blogs.stage.cfainstitute.org/investor/2014/05/26/how-to-measure-…
With smiles,
Jason