notices - See details
Notices
Enterprising Investor Default Hero Image
12 September 2013 Enterprising Investor Blog

Advice on How to Become a Research Analyst

Enterprising Investor Blogs logo thumbnail

Note: This post has been amended (see the end) to include information requested by an overwhelming number of the readers. Thanks for your interest!


I am frequently asked, "What can I do to improve my chances of getting hired as a research analyst?" Beyond the obvious — become a CFA charterholder — there are a number of other steps that aspiring analysts may take.

Making the Intangible Tangible

What an aspiring analyst has to offer to an employer are largely abstract- and creative-thinking skills. These skills are intangible and difficult for recruiters to assess. This is one reason why firms in finance tend to recruit from the same schools decade after decade: rigor of the curriculum and reliably high quality candidates. This is also why those without experience in the investment industry find it hard to get hired for research analyst positions. That is, in the absence of other evidence, firms hire what they think they can depend on — that is, what is tangible: your education and your experience.

Subscribe Button

But do not despair if you have not gone to your country's top educational institution or if you have no experience! I went to the University of Colorado (not a top school for finance recruiters) and had very little experience when I was hired as a research analyst at one of the largest and best-known US money managers.

What employers really want is for your intangible skills to be made tangible. This realization empowers you tremendously, because with this framework, you can focus on providing concrete evidence that you have the skills necessary for being an effective analyst. When I began my career I created a personal website that included: examples of my own personal research analysis on companies; book reviews of economics, finance, and investment texts that demonstrated my ability to think critically about information; and an extended version of my CV (i.e., greater than the orthodox one-page maximum), so human resources departments could see if I had what it took to be a research analyst.

By engaging in these activities it will also sharpen your own skill set. For example, when I created my own research reports — which I highly encourage you to do — I used only primary data sources, such as company annual reports. I also did all of my own calculations for things like future gross domestic product (GDP), the future shape of the yield curve, and the cost of capital.

Recognize that your opinion matters. Companies will be hiring you for your opinion as much as for your skill set. They hire you with the expectation that you will take responsibility for your choices. So, if you choose to make your intangible skills tangible by creating your own research reports then you must track how your investment recommendations do by noting the prices of assets on the day that you recommended them for purchase and then track how they perform over time. You must be honest with yourself, otherwise you won't learn anything. This is more for you than for your future employer. (Though it certainly wouldn't look good for you to get caught fudging the numbers in even a theoretical exercise.) Markets provide a valuable feedback mechanism for assessing your skill set. The beautiful and terrifying thing about investment management is that the results of your performance are measured objectively. You either did well for people or you did not. So, if you are not doing very well, then you need to identify where your analysis broke down, and then strive to improve.

I have a friend who took a similar approach as me to getting work. He sent his research reports to investment firms every single month for two years and eventually got a job interview. By doing this process he taught himself to be an analyst.

Slide of Investment Management: A Science to Teach or an Art to Learn?

Look for a Mentor

Across the globe, CFA Institute has scores of local societies, which are made up of many generous individuals, many of whom may be willing to guide your career track. If that does not appeal, then contact money managers whose process is in alignment with your own. You may be intimidated, but the worst they can say is "no." In any case, any possible anxiety you experience in approaching investment heroes is good practice for the anxiety you may experience in approaching management of prospective businesses, some of whom may include the likes of Rupert Murdoch or Li Ka-Shing.

Analysis Is Probably Not What You Think It Is

Most analysts — the aspiring and the experienced — think that investing is about facts, models, mathematics, and analysis. Yet, as I discuss extensively in my own book, The Intuitive Investor, there is no such thing as a future fact. Facts, by definition, are things that occurred in the past. Yet investing results unfold in the future. What this means is that investing is as much a creative and intuitive process as it is an analytical process. To be a well-rounded and experienced candidate you need to be able to think in a balanced fashion — that is, both analytically and creatively. Therefore, engage in activities that enhance your creativity, too. For me, I am an active meditator, as well as an artist. Your success as an analyst will depend on your ability to synthesize information and to see things no one else is seeing. After all, by definition, if you want to earn returns that no one else is earning, you have to do things that no one else is doing.

Stock Your Mental Toolkit

Another tip is to read, read, read, read. Read investment texts. Read texts on geopolitics. Read texts on mergers and acquisitions. Read economic texts. Read anything that sparks your curiosity, even fiction (potent advice from Tom Brakke, CFA). And most of all, read the news, from many sources every single day, and begin to develop an opinion about the news and how it affects different countries, industries, businesses, and individuals. The most important skill for any investor is: understanding information. He who understands information the best does better, and he who understands information the best and acts decisively on that information wins the day. When I was an aspiring analyst if I encountered a piece of news I did not understand, I would read not just the article in question, but also an entire academic paper or book on the subject. I did this day after day, month after month, and year after year until my mental mosaic became large.

So let your ignorance guide you. What you do not know and understand should inform what you try and learn next.

House ad for Behavioral Finance: The Second Generation

Introspection

Spend some time figuring out who you are as an analyst. This is critically important. Why? If your natural strengths as a thinker make you a good trader, then you will be very frustrated working at a deep value, long-term focused money management firm. Likewise, if your character is more in line with a long-term, deliberate process, then you will likely be frustrated at a high-frequency trading (HFT) shop. You want to know yourself so that you can make an informed decision about where you want to work, about what type of analysis works in accord with your mind, and about where to spend huge parts of your life.

Furthermore, your introspective process will allow you to take an inventory of your innate strengths and weaknesses — and we all have both. You want to develop skills that accentuate your existing talents and skills that compensate for your shortcomings, too.

Be Patient

Expect this entire process to take a lot of time. From the time I first had the idea to become a research analyst to the time I got hired doing the work I wanted to do, it took me five years. For some people it is a much shorter process. But then, having done all of the work I described above, once hired, I was promoted to portfolio manager in two short years and was fortunate enough (and maybe skilled enough) to have retired at age 35.

Best wishes for success!

If you liked this post, don't forget to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.


Update: Many of you in the comments section have requested a link to an example research report. When I began my career I got a copy of a brokerage report from my local market and then used it as the basis for my own report. I am going to point those interested in what a research report looks like to Zacks.com.


All posts are the opinion of the author. As such, they should not be construed as investment advice, nor do the opinions expressed necessarily reflect the views of CFA Institute or the author’s employer.

Image credit: ©Getty Images/TommL


Professional Learning for CFA Institute Members

CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report professional learning (PL) credits earned, including content on Enterprising Investor. Members can record credits easily using their online PL tracker.

Share On

If you liked this post, don’t forget to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.


All posts are the opinion of the author. As such, they should not be construed as investment advice, nor do the opinions expressed necessarily reflect the views of CFA Institute or the author’s employer. Image credit: ©Getty Images / Ascent / PKS Media Inc. 


Professional Learning for CFA Institute Members

CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report professional learning (PL) credits earned, including content on Enterprising Investor. Members can record credits easily using their online PL tracker.

 

410 Comments

JZ
jon zipp (not verified)
3rd August 2015 | 12:02pm

Jason-

Thank you. I will mention that some of the greatest stock pickers are not CFA's or MBA's. In fact, and you can check this, Ann Scheiber was a self taught stock picker, who was right behind Ben Graham in rank. Ernie Kiehne of the Legg Mason Value Trust had no formal training. If you and I both recommend Disney, I'll do it because I like the company and the chart, but I'll use your analysis to extrapolate on future stock price. I agree that firms want to see the piece of paper to demonstrate knowledge, but what if there's no material difference in whether I have it or not. I think the barrier to entry may be higher, but I think I would have an edge over the CFA/MBA because you're not really looking at charts, but numbers. Charts often foretell success or failure or accumululation before the analysts model that.

Case in point. Biogen has had trouble for a few months now, and the chart showed trouble that was not yet apparent. I sold, and sure enough, the issue was poor earnings, That wasn't something the analysts modeled, but because I know how to read charts, I got out of the stock. Similarly, analysts won't often cover stocks below $5, where many biotechs/pharmas start moving. A good chart reader will catch the stock long before you do, but only because your firm might not be able to invest in these.

So, if we are here to make money, the guy who reads charts well, and catches a good stock at $5 will make 100% before the analyst even models the data. I'll go back to Disney. If I like Disney's chart, and believe it is moving higher, based on patterns, how is that less advantageous than modeling a stock? Those are two different methods. I think that one can't be a good CFA unless one understands how to read charts. i think many companies begin moving long before estimates reflect good news. Consider Agenus and Eagle Pharma as examples. By the way, if we compare the CFA who gets 20% returns vs. the chart reader who gets 40%, what is the true difference? I'd rather have the chart reader on my staff, just because he'll catch ideas before my analysts do. No program can teach you that as a CFA or MBA. Besides, I'd argue that having the chart reader and CFA might help me model stocks based on anomalies in the charts that make my CFA ask harder questions.

I appreciate your time.

-Jon

AN
ahmed nganya (not verified)
17th October 2016 | 11:05am

Chart reading is not a science where the controlled experiments tend to yield predictable results. IMO, investing is more about knowing thyself and the business you want to get into. Any investor is obliged to do a proper research before buying any security or he's risking to get wiped out with Mr. Market. Arming yourself with only a chat is a recipe for loss marking. Bring me one chart reader and I'll show you a fortune teller. Finally, I would like to know why most chart readers are broke comparing to value investors like Seth Klarman.

AP
Ambar P. (not verified)
11th July 2017 | 2:43pm

Dear Jon zipp - you are great. You have converted your scars - hearing disability - into wonderful eye scanning ability of chart reading. just one word of caution - charts are past. They are indicators of past trends. There are several other factors such as fundamentals, positive news flow, earnings, changes in macro economy etc etc which can potentially turn the tables any day. At least I would look for lot of other data along with chart to figure out future price action. Thanks - you are lovely and wonderful and so is Jason - who wrote this great blog in first place.

MA
M Ashok (not verified)
12th September 2013 | 1:21am

Dear Jason,

Thanks for this wonderful message!

I am sure a lot of students and members will be helped by your advice and insights.

I don't remember coming across anyone who talked about the research analyst job so candidly like you do.

In a sense you are saying that it's just not a 9 to 5 job, you have to immerse yourself fully into this world that you painted. Quite true, I have spoken to successul and upcoming fund managers and they too have sound 'read anything and everything, you never now where your idea will come from'.

Thanks again for the message. Looking forward to hear more from you.

Regards,
M Ashok ,CFA

JA
Jason A. Voss, CFA (not verified)
12th September 2013 | 8:18am

Hello M Ashok,

Yes, the job of the research analyst is one where all waking hours are spent working. Not necessarily at the job, but because your entire world is now contextualized through an investors' lens. Everything you see and everyone you encounter is possibly 'investable' information.

Glad you liked the piece!

Jason

SS
Subhash Sahu (not verified)
6th December 2013 | 6:13am

aHi Sir,
i am pursuing MBA in Finance. could you plz sugest me about the Research Analyst. What should be requirment for the Research Analyst.

JA
Jason A. Voss, CFA (not verified)
6th December 2013 | 9:30am

Hello Subhash,

Every employer will have different criteria for what they want from a candidate. However, most will want a college degree; experience in a business environment, preferably in finance or economics, or in an environment where you have learned a significant amount about an industry; evidence of high performance; and so forth. Imagine what most employers want from a candidate and multiply by 5.

Look at some of the job descriptions on The Ladders for Research Analyst and you will get a good sense for what they want from candidates.

With smiles,

Jason

H
Hermann (not verified)
12th September 2013 | 3:45am

Thanks very much Jason for the time you take to teach us every step of your career building. This is inspiring for me since want to move from my current accounting position to investment field.

JA
Jason A. Voss, CFA (not verified)
12th September 2013 | 8:21am

Hi Hermann,

Best wishes to you for success. You are welcome for the advice. Most business schools will not give you the kind of advice you really need and there is no need for such things to be secret.

Jason

TA
Tom Adshead (not verified)
12th September 2013 | 8:04am

This is an excellent article, and one to which I shall refer a lot of people.

One thing I would add is there in the article, but I'd emphasise it differently. When I was preparing for interviews at university, one of the best bits of advice I got was that interviewers look for enthusiasm in a candidate. I was told: "The course is hard work, and the person interviewing you will be teaching you, and you will be no fun to teach if you don't love the subject. There are lots of candidates with the technical ability, but I always look for the one who really loves the subject."

It's clear that the writer really is interested in the stock market, or he would not have done his own research, built his website, and so on. This is like gold dust to an interviewer - I always ask analyst candidates if they trade stocks, or watch stocks, and it's amazing how few of them do. But without that burning interest, a candidate is unlikely to put in the time to become a really good analyst - if all they care about is money, then they should go into corporate finance or sales.

Another example is my own sister - I got her an interview with my boss, the head of European research at a bulge bracket bank, and she met the team and the head of sales. The report was unanimous: "She's very bright (she had just done an MBA at Wharton), everything's there, but it's just clear that she's not really interested in markets and stocks, she just wants a job." And it was hard to argue with them, as it was true. (She ended up doing well in advertising, which was much more to her taste).

So my advice to any candidate is to come armed with enthusiasm, and proof of enthusiasm, and this will really set you apart from other candidates. But one comment: an interest in the stock market as a form of gambling is not the same as an interest in stocks - what your boss will really be looking for is a passion for companies, how they succeed, and how the market rewards that - not just an interest in buying low and selling high. It's a fine distinction, but you can always tell who has that curiosity, and that's what every head of research wants to find and harness.

Good luck to you all!