Note: This post has been amended (see the end) to include information requested by an overwhelming number of the readers. Thanks for your interest!
I am frequently asked, "What can I do to improve my chances of getting hired as a research analyst?" Beyond the obvious — become a CFA charterholder — there are a number of other steps that aspiring analysts may take.
Making the Intangible Tangible
What an aspiring analyst has to offer to an employer are largely abstract- and creative-thinking skills. These skills are intangible and difficult for recruiters to assess. This is one reason why firms in finance tend to recruit from the same schools decade after decade: rigor of the curriculum and reliably high quality candidates. This is also why those without experience in the investment industry find it hard to get hired for research analyst positions. That is, in the absence of other evidence, firms hire what they think they can depend on — that is, what is tangible: your education and your experience.
But do not despair if you have not gone to your country's top educational institution or if you have no experience! I went to the University of Colorado (not a top school for finance recruiters) and had very little experience when I was hired as a research analyst at one of the largest and best-known US money managers.
What employers really want is for your intangible skills to be made tangible. This realization empowers you tremendously, because with this framework, you can focus on providing concrete evidence that you have the skills necessary for being an effective analyst. When I began my career I created a personal website that included: examples of my own personal research analysis on companies; book reviews of economics, finance, and investment texts that demonstrated my ability to think critically about information; and an extended version of my CV (i.e., greater than the orthodox one-page maximum), so human resources departments could see if I had what it took to be a research analyst.
By engaging in these activities it will also sharpen your own skill set. For example, when I created my own research reports — which I highly encourage you to do — I used only primary data sources, such as company annual reports. I also did all of my own calculations for things like future gross domestic product (GDP), the future shape of the yield curve, and the cost of capital.
Recognize that your opinion matters. Companies will be hiring you for your opinion as much as for your skill set. They hire you with the expectation that you will take responsibility for your choices. So, if you choose to make your intangible skills tangible by creating your own research reports then you must track how your investment recommendations do by noting the prices of assets on the day that you recommended them for purchase and then track how they perform over time. You must be honest with yourself, otherwise you won't learn anything. This is more for you than for your future employer. (Though it certainly wouldn't look good for you to get caught fudging the numbers in even a theoretical exercise.) Markets provide a valuable feedback mechanism for assessing your skill set. The beautiful and terrifying thing about investment management is that the results of your performance are measured objectively. You either did well for people or you did not. So, if you are not doing very well, then you need to identify where your analysis broke down, and then strive to improve.
I have a friend who took a similar approach as me to getting work. He sent his research reports to investment firms every single month for two years and eventually got a job interview. By doing this process he taught himself to be an analyst.
Look for a Mentor
Across the globe, CFA Institute has scores of local societies, which are made up of many generous individuals, many of whom may be willing to guide your career track. If that does not appeal, then contact money managers whose process is in alignment with your own. You may be intimidated, but the worst they can say is "no." In any case, any possible anxiety you experience in approaching investment heroes is good practice for the anxiety you may experience in approaching management of prospective businesses, some of whom may include the likes of Rupert Murdoch or Li Ka-Shing.
Analysis Is Probably Not What You Think It Is
Most analysts — the aspiring and the experienced — think that investing is about facts, models, mathematics, and analysis. Yet, as I discuss extensively in my own book, The Intuitive Investor, there is no such thing as a future fact. Facts, by definition, are things that occurred in the past. Yet investing results unfold in the future. What this means is that investing is as much a creative and intuitive process as it is an analytical process. To be a well-rounded and experienced candidate you need to be able to think in a balanced fashion — that is, both analytically and creatively. Therefore, engage in activities that enhance your creativity, too. For me, I am an active meditator, as well as an artist. Your success as an analyst will depend on your ability to synthesize information and to see things no one else is seeing. After all, by definition, if you want to earn returns that no one else is earning, you have to do things that no one else is doing.
Stock Your Mental Toolkit
Another tip is to read, read, read, read. Read investment texts. Read texts on geopolitics. Read texts on mergers and acquisitions. Read economic texts. Read anything that sparks your curiosity, even fiction (potent advice from Tom Brakke, CFA). And most of all, read the news, from many sources every single day, and begin to develop an opinion about the news and how it affects different countries, industries, businesses, and individuals. The most important skill for any investor is: understanding information. He who understands information the best does better, and he who understands information the best and acts decisively on that information wins the day. When I was an aspiring analyst if I encountered a piece of news I did not understand, I would read not just the article in question, but also an entire academic paper or book on the subject. I did this day after day, month after month, and year after year until my mental mosaic became large.
So let your ignorance guide you. What you do not know and understand should inform what you try and learn next.
Introspection
Spend some time figuring out who you are as an analyst. This is critically important. Why? If your natural strengths as a thinker make you a good trader, then you will be very frustrated working at a deep value, long-term focused money management firm. Likewise, if your character is more in line with a long-term, deliberate process, then you will likely be frustrated at a high-frequency trading (HFT) shop. You want to know yourself so that you can make an informed decision about where you want to work, about what type of analysis works in accord with your mind, and about where to spend huge parts of your life.
Furthermore, your introspective process will allow you to take an inventory of your innate strengths and weaknesses — and we all have both. You want to develop skills that accentuate your existing talents and skills that compensate for your shortcomings, too.
Be Patient
Expect this entire process to take a lot of time. From the time I first had the idea to become a research analyst to the time I got hired doing the work I wanted to do, it took me five years. For some people it is a much shorter process. But then, having done all of the work I described above, once hired, I was promoted to portfolio manager in two short years and was fortunate enough (and maybe skilled enough) to have retired at age 35.
Best wishes for success!
If you liked this post, don't forget to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.
Update: Many of you in the comments section have requested a link to an example research report. When I began my career I got a copy of a brokerage report from my local market and then used it as the basis for my own report. I am going to point those interested in what a research report looks like to Zacks.com.
All posts are the opinion of the author. As such, they should not be construed as investment advice, nor do the opinions expressed necessarily reflect the views of CFA Institute or the author’s employer.
Image credit: ©Getty Images/TommL
Professional Learning for CFA Institute Members
CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report professional learning (PL) credits earned, including content on Enterprising Investor. Members can record credits easily using their online PL tracker.
If you liked this post, don’t forget to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.
All posts are the opinion of the author. As such, they should not be construed as investment advice, nor do the opinions expressed necessarily reflect the views of CFA Institute or the author’s employer. Image credit: ©Getty Images / Ascent / PKS Media Inc.
Professional Learning for CFA Institute Members
CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report professional learning (PL) credits earned, including content on Enterprising Investor. Members can record credits easily using their online PL tracker.
410 Comments
Hello Nitin,
I have answered that question once before in this big stack of questions and answers, but recognize that it may take some time to find the answer. In my opinion, both the MBA and CFA have both important overlaps, as well as differences. I have both my MBA and CFA. Lots of data shows that a CFA is more valuable to prospective employers of financial pros than an MBA, and as you pointed out, it is also cheaper. Also, your local CFA society provides a very valuable network that is comparable to your MBA network. However, if you do want to be a research analyst (either on the buyside or sellside), an MBA really helps you to understand businesses and the concerns they face on a daily basis. This is invaluable as an analyst (to know and understand a company from a company's perspective).
Best wishes for success!
Jason
hello sir,
whether i have to learn VBA in addition to excel to become a good equity research analyst or to enter in Research sector???
pls guide sir....
thank you sir
Hello and thank you for your question!
In my opinion knowing how to program computers is one of life's essential skills, like knowing how to type on a keyboard. Once you know how to program in any language then you learn the logic of computers, and then learning another language, like VBA is easy. Whether VBA is the language you focus on, or Matlab, or whatever, is going to be up to your employer. I, myself do not know how to program proficiently in VBA. But I do know (and I am showing my age here) BASIC, PASCAL, and LOGO. I have done a very minor amount of coding in VBA. So if you have the time, then yes, I would recommend learning to program a computer.
Yours, in service, and best wishes for success!
Jason
mns it is going to help me in research career......??
Hello again,
I am sorry that I did not address your question well enough the first time : ). Yes, in my opinion it will help your investing career, because it will give you much greater flexibility in your ability to analyze data and to create models based on data.
Yours, in service,
Jason
Actually, i want to be research analyst. I have already analyzed on some projects. I would like to apply your tips!
Jason,
First of all, thank you so much for the wonderful content in this article! Its very motivating and inspiring to be hearing first hand about what ER Analysis really pertains to.
I was hoping you could offer some individualized advice for me in my pursuits on beginning a career in ER analysis. I recently graduated (less than 1 year ago) from a mid-tier school with an Economics degree and am currently working in wealth management as a financial adviser at one of the major banks. I have a strong passion for investing, but as I get more immersed in the securities business I am realizing that being a broker isn't my goal - it is in equity research in an analysis position.
In order to improve my chances and strengthen my resume I have registered to sit for the CFA Level 1 exam. I also plan on taking many online courses to familiarize myself with Excel and other programs used in financial modeling. Additionally, I realize wealth management is unrelated to the work required of an analyst, but would the experience within financial markets at least help in some fashion?
My "idea" is that once I pass the first CFA exam I will gain an understanding in some areas of Finance and Accounting that employers are looking for which I lack due to my degree in Economics. Ultimately, I am hoping that my experience in financial planning as a broker combined with (at a minimum) a CFA Level 1 designation at the time I begin applying could be sufficient to be given an opportunity as a junior analyst.
Could you possibly lend me any advice? My fear is investing so much time into the CFA to come to the conclusion that my resume isn't strong enough to land a position. Thank you so much in advance for any help you can give me.
Thanks again,
Carter
Hi Carter,
Thank you for your kind words.
Regarding your question...You have a long road ahead of you. Your economics background is useful as a complement to the skills of a research analyst. However, as you stated, on their own they will not land you a position. Instead, once you have your CFA charter it will separate you from other candidates. There are two primary benefits to an economics degree, most folks only have one of the benefits. Those benefits are the deep appreciation of benefits vs. costs, and the other is econometric modeling. Most undergraduate economics programs do not teach econometric modeling, though. Your current work as a financial adviser has two primary benefits, as well. First, you are learning the ridiculous jargon associated with investing - this is no small task. Also, you are learning about the issues confronted by many clients in their personal finances.
The above skills are also garnered by attaining your CFA charter, though. So these are not big differentiators. I can think of no more beneficial things for you right now than attaining your CFA charter. It is an extremely low cost way of attaining a credential that is more valued than a MBA. As I outline in this article (and in the many comments answered), you also need to make tangible your skill set to a prospective employer. Your daily question of yourself should be: if I knew what I know about myself, would I hire me? If the answer to that question is 'no' then you need to keep plugging along until the answer is a 'yes.' In my personal case I was in exactly the same situation that you describe: economics degree and aspiring adviser wanting to be a research analyst. That was in 1993, and it took me another 5 years to acquire the components necessary to be a compelling candidate.
These components included: MBA, Level I of CFA passed, a year of work as an analyst intern at a pension consultant, having read 100 or so books on investing (including lots and lots of accounting), and having developed my own research reports as described in this article. Along the way there were many existential moments about whether or not I believed in myself enough to persevere. There was no guarantee on the other side of all this work, just a dream. But on a daily basis I navigated toward it.
Best wishes for success!
Jason
Hi Jason,
Thanks for the great article!
I am hoping if you can offer some advice for me to pursuit ER career.
As for my background, I have a statistics degree and ACCA (accounting professional qualification).
Currently, I am working in a mid-tier audit firm as an auditor (approaching 1 year of experience). For job scope wise, most of the time we are testing if the financial statements are "done" accurately.
Is it wise to stay on as auditor for the next few years to get the chartered accountant qualification? Cos from what I sense, there seems to be no transferable skill from auditor to ER analyst. And what really worries me is that after 3 years, I might be pigeon-holed as an accountant/auditor.
Thanks in advance!
Hello Jun Xiang,
I think your background is excellent for a career in equity research. Very few research analysts or portfolio managers have a deep grasp of accounting. Here is a post I wrote entitled "Top 5 Accounting Mistakes Analysts Make" https://blogs.stage.cfainstitute.org/investor/2015/05/12/the-top-five-a… [https://blogs.cfainstitute.org/investor/2015/05/12/the-top-five-account…] where I discuss this in some detail. Also, just last week I was the moderator for a panel on misleading accounting at the New York Society of Security Analysts (NYSSA). Before we started I asked the audience of experience investment professionals how many felt they were excellent at accounting, and no one raised their hands. Your background as an auditor opens you up for an extended career as a specialist. In order to really increase your chances I would highly encourage you to attain your CFA charter, or a graduate business degree. This is an unbeatable combination. Then when you are marketing your candidacy I highly recommend that you feature your accounting background and your understanding of how financial statements may be manipulated.
As for getting pigeonholed...I think that is unlikely given that your background as an auditor is a perennially important skill set.
Best wishes for success!
Jason