Chapter 10: Ethical AI in Finance

This chapter of AI in Asset Management: Tools, Applications, and Frontiers explains how artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming financial services while raising urgent ethical challenges. It shows that AI can improve efficiency, decision-making, and risk management but also creates risks such as bias, data misuse, and lack of transparency. The chapter calls on financial institutions, investment managers, and regulators to adopt ethical principles — fairness, accountability, and transparency — to guide AI use. It matters now because rapid AI adoption demands responsible governance to protect trust, ensure fairness, and maintain stability in global financial systems.

AI is reshaping the finance industry by automating trading, improving fraud detection, enhancing credit scoring, and strengthening risk management. It helps institutions make faster, data-driven decisions and uncover insights from large datasets. Investment managers use AI to optimize portfolios, while compliance teams use it to detect suspicious activity. As AI becomes more powerful, however, concerns about fairness, transparency, and accountability are heightened, making ethical oversight essential for long-term trust and stability.

This chapter addresses the opportunities and challenges of integrating AI into financial markets through the lens of ethics. It highlights the risks of bias, opacity, and data misuse while providing practical recommendations for ensuring that AI adoption enhances, rather than erodes, trust in finance.

Risk and compliance officers, investment and asset managers, and financial regulators are the practitioners that directly shape, deploy, or oversee AI in financial services. This makes them central to addressing issues of bias, transparency, accountability, and data privacy. By applying this chapter’s recommendations, this community may be able to balance innovation with ethical responsibility, helping to ensure AI enhances efficiency and trust without undermining fairness or stability.

Financial institutions are adopting AI at an accelerating pace. Machine learning (ML) and large language models (LLMs) are already reshaping investment processes, improving fraud detection, and automating compliance monitoring. Generative AI, the latest frontier, is expanding these capabilities by generating insights, drafting communications, and even supporting decision-making. Research shows that firms investing heavily in AI enjoy higher sales growth, employment, and market value — a powerful incentive driving adoption across the sector.

But these gains come with risks. AI models often operate as “black boxes,” making it difficult to explain or justify their outputs to clients, boards, or regulators. Biased training data can produce discriminatory outcomes in lending, hiring, or fraud detection. Overreliance on automated trading systems can amplify volatility and undermine market stability. And without robust data governance, the sensitive information on which AI systems rely becomes a liability in the face of growing cyber threats.

Against this backdrop, embedding ethical principles into AI systems is not just a moral imperative; it is a business and regulatory necessity. Financial institutions that fail to implement ethical AI risk reputational damage, regulatory penalties, and the erosion of trust in markets.

• Bias and fairness must be actively managed. AI models in finance risk reinforcing discrimination unless diverse datasets, fairness metrics, and regular audits are applied.
• Transparency and explainability are essential. Black-box models undermine trust; explainable AI (XAI) is critical for accountability to clients, boards, and regulators.
• Data privacy and security are non-negotiable. Strong governance and cybersecurity practices are needed to protect sensitive financial data and comply with evolving regulations.
• Human oversight remains critical. Even advanced AI systems require human judgment in high-stakes decisions to ensure accountability and reduce systemic risks.
• Robust governance and regulation are key. Embedding ethical principles into AI frameworks, alongside proactive regulatory engagement, is essential to balance innovation with responsibility.
• Ethical AI is a strategic advantage. Firms that integrate ethics into AI adoption will not only mitigate risk but also strengthen client trust, market reputation, and long-term competitiveness.

Risk and Compliance Officers

• Audit and monitor Al models for bias and fairness in credit, fraud, and risk systems
• Implement XAI to justify model outputs to clients, boards, and regulators
• Strengthen data governance and cybersecurity to comply with privacy laws (e.g., General Data Protection Regulation)

Investment and Asset Managers

• Design responsible trading and portfolio strategies using Al, with stress-testing for market stability
• Provide transparent client communications explaining Al’s role in investment decisions
• Apply fairness checks to ensure bias-free credit and risk models

Regulators and Policymakers

• Use risk-based frameworks (e.g., EU AI Act) to govern AI applications in finance.
• Build cross-disciplinary expertise among supervisors to monitor AI effectively
• Encourage early engagement with firms on standards, audits, and reporting
• Promote global coordination to harmonize Al regulations and reduce systemic risk

AI is no longer a future trend in finance. It is an immediate reality, reshaping markets, compliance, and regulation. The benefits are undeniable — efficiency, deeper insights, and competitive advantages — but so are the ethical challenges. For risk and compliance officers, the priority is embedding fairness, transparency, and accountability into systems from the outset. For investment managers, the challenge is to harness AI responsibly while maintaining client trust and market integrity. For regulators, the task is to craft agile governance that both protects the public and fosters innovation.

The chapter’s message is clear: AI’s transformative potential in finance can be realized only if it is guided by strong ethical principles, proactive governance, and close collaboration between industry and regulators. By embedding ethics at the heart of AI adoption, the financial sector can build a future that is not only more efficient but also more fair, transparent, and resilient.

This summary is based on the CFA Institute Research Foundation chapter “Ethical AI in Finance,” by Anna Martirosyan. It examines how institutions can harness AI responsibly by embedding ethical principles, such as fairness, transparency, accountability, and privacy, into systems.

Why is ethical AI particularly important in financial services?

Finance directly affects people’s livelihoods and economic stability. AI systems used in lending, trading, risk management, and fraud detection must be fair, transparent, and accountable because biased or opaque models can lead to discrimination, market instability, or loss of trust. Ethical AI ensures that technological innovation enhances efficiency without undermining fairness or financial integrity.

What are the biggest ethical risks of AI in finance?

The main risks include algorithmic bias (leading to unfair outcomes in lending or hiring), lack of transparency (black-box models that cannot be explained), data privacy violations (misuse of sensitive financial or personal data), and systemic risks (AI-driven trading or decision-making amplifying volatility). Without safeguards, these risks can erode trust, trigger regulatory penalties, and damage firms’ reputations.

How can financial institutions implement ethical AI in practice?

• Use diverse datasets and apply bias mitigation techniques.
• Adopt XAI to clarify model outputs.
• Strengthen data governance and cybersecurity to protect sensitive information.
• Maintain human oversight in high-stakes decisions.
• Conduct regular audits and engage proactively with regulators. These steps embed ethical principles into day-to-day operations and reduce long-term risks.

What role should regulators play in shaping ethical AI adoption?

Regulators must provide risk-based frameworks (e.g., EU AI Act), ensure AI literacy among supervisors, and promote early engagement with firms on standards, reporting, and audits. They should also foster international coordination to harmonize rules, reduce regulatory arbitrage, and strengthen global financial stability. By setting clear expectations, regulators help balance innovation with accountability.

Adrian, Tobias. 2024. “Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on Financial Markets and Financial Stability.” Speech delivered at Bund Summit 2024 “Navigating a Changing World.” Shanghai, China. International Monetary Fund. www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2024/09/06/sp090624-artificial-intelligence-and-its-impact-on-financia….

A&O Shearman. 2024. “Zooming in on AI #6: AI Under Financial Regulations in the U.S., EU and U.K.—A Comparative Assessment of the Current State of Play: Part 2” (7 October). www.aoshearman.com/en/insights/ao-shearman-on-tech/zooming-in-on-ai-ai-under-financial-regulations-….

CFA Institute. 2024. “How Machine Learning Is Transforming the Investment Process” (4 March). www.cfainstitute.org/insights/articles/how-machine-learning-is-transforming-the-investment-process.

Financial Stability Board. 2024. “The Financial Stability Implications of Artificial Intelligence” (14 November). www.fsb.org/2024/11/the-financial-stability-implications-of-artificial-intelligence/.