notices - See details
Notices
Enterprising Investor Default Hero Image
8 November 2018 Enterprising Investor Blog

Bitcoin: New Asset Class or Pyramid Scheme?

Enterprising Investor Blogs logo thumbnail

Merriam-Webster defines a pyramid scheme as “a usually illegal operation in which participants pay to join and profit mainly from payments made by subsequent participants.

The former general counsel of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Debra A. Valentine, said the following:

"Pyramid schemes now come in so many forms that they may be difficult to recognize immediately. However, they all share one overriding characteristic. They promise consumers or investors large profits based primarily on recruiting others to join their program, not based on profits from any real investment or real sale of goods to the public."

Does a vehicle that provides no cash flows, transfers no tangible or intangible property rights, and is marketed through claims that new buyers can be persuaded to drive up prices fit this description?

I believe bitcoin is such an instrument.

Subscribe Button

Bitcoin is too inefficient to be a currency. Certainly, no government has any plans to use it as one. And when bitcoin fuels actual transactions — other than those of the speculative variety — it is often to keep the transaction off the radar of the legal authorities: think ransomware, skirting anti-money laundering laws, or evading capital constraints.

Thus the sole way most promoters will realize value from their bitcoin holdings is through new entrants into the market. Public statements by speculators illustrate this:

Store of Value?

The “store of value” argument also depends on new buyers coming in to support those who want to liquidate their holdings. Again, this suggests a pyramid scheme, albeit one that doesn’t promise explicitly high returns. Whatever it is, it is not a legitimate investment.

Stock appreciation ultimately implies that people owning the shares earn increasing profits. Commodities are more than just “stores of value.” Governments require the use of fiat currencies. With a few notable exceptions, governments stabilize their currencies and don't sell them to the general public as speculative investments. For these exceptions, more stable currencies are available.

Some say bitcoin is similar to gold. In the best of cases, should ownership stabilize, bitcoin and gold would share certain characteristics: Both would be volatile investments with poor long-term returns.

But gold has other uses: To fashion jewelry and other art, for example, or even as doomsday currency should electricity and internet become unavailable. Bitcoin can’t serve either of these roles.

More likely, after the supply of new buyers is exhausted, the final investors in the pyramid will find themselves with assets that decline in value as others sell because the one thing that they expected from bitcoin — higher prices — ceases to materialize.

Ad for Earning Investors' Trust Report

Social Value?

Does investing in bitcoin have any social value? Investing in the securities markets provides capital to firms, governments, and other entities. Speculation in commodities creates markets that allow their users to hedge their exposure to price fluctuations.

Bitcoin can help people evade government restrictions on currency and capital. But even that dubious distinction rarely enters the discussion among bitcoin supporters. Still, we cannot ignore laws and regulations we disagree with or governments we disapprove of. Furthermore, the same mechanisms that can help people avoid capital controls through bitcoin can also help them avoid government sanctions against unsavory regimes and engage in money laundering and ransomware schemes.

Perhaps these excesses could be tolerated if they were mere side effects. But other than for speculation, bitcoin has no utility beyond such activities. No doubt some will point to blockchain and claim that it is the silver lining to the crypto cloud, and demonstrates bitcoin's merits as an investment. But bitcoin provides no rights to use or profit from blockchain technologies. Whatever they have to offer, one does not need to purchase cryptocurrency to use blockchain.

So encouraging the purchase of bitcoin by invoking the benefits of blockchain is clearly misleading.

How is bitcoin different from other pyramid schemes, say, those run in penny-stock boiler rooms? The only distinguishing characteristics are the record-keeping method — a “proof of work” blockchain — and a large marketing effort that uses the media instead of the telephone.

In my view, most of those who invest in bitcoin are effectively participating in a pyramid scheme either as a future victim or a perpetrator. Some no doubt truly believe that bitcoin will function as a currency for enabling transactions, rather than a “store of value." But I wonder whether such people truly understand economics, our monetary system, or our business environment

Financial Analysts Journal Ad

These critiques are not unique to bitcoin, but apply to all cryptocurrencies. Some could offer value as electronic coupons to purchase yet-to-be-developed services. However, that does not constitute a new asset class, but rather an existing asset class with a new record-keeping system. So investors must apply the same due diligence as for other investments to assess what legal rights they are purchasing and the ability and willingness of others to deliver on their commitments.

It is not my intention to play the thought police here. My point is investment managers need to consider these issues before investing in or promoting cryptocurrencies. So should those responsible for personnel decisions about managers.

Because the fact is, if it looks like a pyramid scheme and sounds like a pyramid scheme, we should treat it like a pyramid scheme until proven otherwise.

If you liked this post, don’t forget to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.


All posts are the opinion of the author. As such, they should not be construed as investment advice, nor do the opinions expressed necessarily reflect the views of CFA Institute or the author’s employer.

Image credit: ©Getty Images/ Malte Mueller


Professional Learning for CFA Institute Members

CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report professional learning (PL) credits earned, including content on Enterprising Investor. Members can record credits easily using their online PL tracker.

61 Comments

ED
Eddy Dostal, CFA (not verified)
16th March 2021 | 2:23pm

Jonathan, you make some interesting points.

1) Amazon comparison - Bitcoin is the same thing, both the buyer and seller can win. The seller gets the price appreciation up to the point of sale; the buyer will eventually get to use this phenomenal technology (whether to send money to family as a remittance, as a store of value to save up for a Tesla, or just as a 6 month living expense emergency fund). Also nice your stock example is Amazon and not Kodak, Enron, Sears or Pan-Am Airlines.

2) Gold - Why exclude the 20% sitting in central banks? Bitcoin is the greatest reserve currency asset we have on earth. I look forward to the day the 1st central bank begins to accumulate Bitcoin (followed quickly after by other central banks adding it as a reserve currency. I think in France there are already rumors and whispers).

3) Layers - You cannot look at total energy consumption. They are hydroelectric facilities that are 500 km's from any electric grid and they use excess energy to mine Bitcoin. Same thing with hydro dams in Quebec, where the government allows mining with excess energy that cannot be stored. Same thing at some of the hydro dams in China where they overbuilt. If you look at oil drillers in Texas, some of them used to flare off excess gas because they are not connected to a pipeline (now with Bitcoin mining they have a way to use it). Granted a good portion of Bitcoin mining electricity still comes from coal based sources, this issue could be solved by switching from Proof-of-Work to Proof-of-Stake, or Layer 2 solutions as I mentioned (where Bitcoin transactions will be moved off chain and use virtually no energy). On chain activity, might only account for major multi-million dollar transfers of value. On that topic, the legacy banking industry still uses an estimated 5X the energy consumption that Bitcoin does, so we also really need to clean up the dirty legacy financial industry (might need more cleaning than Bitcoin needs).

4) Inflation - LOL gold is a poor long term inflation hedge? Over last 130 years, housing prices have been in a tight range of ~200 ounces of gold to ~600 ounces of gold per house (even in biblical times, there are documents of houses being sold for ~500 ounces of gold). Meanwhile your USD is expected to deteriorate ~2% each and every year... Actually the USD has dropped ~95%+ over the last 100 years. If you are Apple and sitting on $100 Billion USD, you are expecting it to lose ~25% over the next decade just by keeping USD on your balance sheet. Not yet certain Bitcoin is superior, but there is a non-trivial chance that it is far superior to USD, EUR or JPY fiat money when used as a reserve currency.

source on gold vs. houses:
https://www.longtermtrends.net/real-estate-gold-ratio/

JG
Jonathan G Harris (not verified)
24th April 2021 | 8:28pm

USD dropping by 2% a year is a feature, not a bug. Unless you keep your USD in a matress, it is a non-problem, because you invest your USD and earn interest or put it in riskier investment and earn profits.

Going from 200 ounces of gold to 600 ounces of gold in a short period is a huge change. If you look at the past 10 years, the amount of house you could buy for 600 ounces of gold has varied by quite a bit.

If you want a hedge against inflation, a portfolio of t-bills that is constantly rolled over works far better than gold at maintaining purchasing power.

Finally, despite the attempts at greenwashing, the fact is very little Bitcoin mining is done with truly stranded electricity. Such electricity could also power data centers and supercomputer farms

JG
Jonathan G Harris (not verified)
24th April 2021 | 8:33pm

Show the source of your statement that France's central bank is thinking of buying Bitcoin. The only movement is a petition started by a blockchain developer.

The rise of Bitcoin has been heavily driven by these kinds of rumors and lies about its efficiency and usefulness.

L
Leo (not verified)
16th March 2021 | 4:51pm

Your pyramid scheme criticism is beyond lazy, and your attempt to differentiate BTC from Amazon stock is exactly the same. Amazon has never paid a dividend. When was the last time it bought back its own shares? And what to make of investments in companies who are not profitable (yet, presumably)? Are those companies all pyramid schemes, too?

You've painted yourself into a corner. You either continue to double down on this absurd criticism, or you acknowledge you were wrong. Howard Marks had the character to do the latter (https://www.kedglobal.com/newsView/ked202103150009). Do you?

JG
Jonathan G Harris (not verified)
24th April 2021 | 8:21pm

Bitcoin is guaranteed never to pay a dividend or buy back shares or produce anything.

ED
Eddy Dostal CFA (not verified)
30th October 2021 | 9:39am

Hey Jonathan - your comment “USD dropping by 2% each year is a feature and not a bug”…

You should update that to “USD dropping by 5.4% each year is a feature and not a bug”

The country of El Salvador just bought more Bitcoin this week. The Houston firefighters pension fund just bought $25MM of Bitcoin this week. George Soros finally bought Bitcoin this week. Jonathan, what do you use as your personal store of value or reserve currency? Real bond yields are mostly negative now on government bonds FYI

AS
Albert Stark (not verified)
9th December 2021 | 6:41am

Hello Jonathan Harris,
Thanks for this post..
You had asked, This visionary question in 2018.
Bitcoin: New Asset Class or Pyramid Scheme?
But now in 2021 Bitcoin prove itself as New Asset Class.

ED
Eddy Dostal CFA (not verified)
10th December 2021 | 6:10pm

Jonathan - US CPI now running at 6.8%. Are you still saying that the USD deteriorating 7% per year is a “feature, not a bug”

The Deutsche Mark deteriorating 90% each year last century was also a feature of the Deutsche Mark

Also last month the Bitcoin successfully completed the Taproot upgrade with Schnorr signatures. The greatest Store-Of-Value just keeps improving! USD never gets smarter. At best they just change the cotton polymer paper it’s printed on. Sometimes they print $3 Trillion of it just like it is leaves on a tree

Thank you again!

BJ
Ben Jonas (not verified)
21st December 2021 | 3:53am

There is no doubt that this is a very cool scheme but with an investment. Nobody knows that how much powerful is this. You can invest in it with very short amount. You can get a lot more information about bitcoin with Bitcoinsensus.com this is a news and updates website of bitcoin. Where you can find its price change and exchanges information hour by hour.

JS
Jack Shaw (not verified)
7th February 2022 | 6:20am

You have given good information about the Pyramid scheme at the initial level. Looking for some more information about the Ponzi scheme.