new tech is great if you pick the right one. And that is the problem with new tech. Which one will end up being the standard ? The best approach is to be slower than others to jump into the next tech, but not refusing it down the road. Let others first test and fail with this "new tech", and implement the ones that survives the ordeal, coz they provide a real solution (saving time or money or better doing already done stuff). Darwinism in tech is extremely high. Pick the wrong one, and you lost a lot of money (and staff, if they don't want to use it and move to some competitor). That is the quandary with all this.