notices - See details
Notices
JW
Jim Watkins (not verified)
23rd August 2017 | 8:05am

Excellent article Preston. A a securities attorney, I did s similar analysis when I saw such claims. Findings same as yours. Also troubling wax the fact that they represented that study began when their load was much higher than current 5.75%. Tje also used nominal returns instead of liad-adjusted returns, inflating performsnce. The noted in small footnote that returns would have been lower using load-adjusted returns.