Interesting that your article on the value of diversity does not touch on the interest, integrity, abilities or experience of the person, male or female, in their role on a team/board etc. It simply states that diversity of the sake of diversity is good. This is just a sad attempt to push a social agenda under the guise of a 'moral imperative'. It is also demeaning to the women who possess all the traits to be leaders without the quota requirement. What about freedom of choice, in the pursuit of a career, regardless of gender? Social engineering, even with the best of intentions, always fails in its goal of equality.
Interesting that your article on the value of diversity does not touch on the interest, integrity, abilities or experience of the person, male or female, in their role on a team/board etc. It simply states that diversity of the sake of diversity is good. This is just a sad attempt to push a social agenda under the guise of a 'moral imperative'. It is also demeaning to the women who possess all the traits to be leaders without the quota requirement. What about freedom of choice, in the pursuit of a career, regardless of gender? Social engineering, even with the best of intentions, always fails in its goal of equality.