Agree with the thesis that that we are witnessing a transition in the interaction with technology. The trend is well on its way and the iWatch is certainly a part of it. Just not convinced that the iWatch represents that transition as strongly as the article suggests. As mentioned there are numerous pre-existing wearables that represent elements of the iWatch, what makes their existence less monumental? Apple is no stranger to trendsetting and I have no doubt that it is well aware and capable of capitalising on the wearables trend but whether this iteration of the iWatch is all that, i'm not so sure. Perhaps the mere fact that Apple has a name as a trendsetter though is enough to make the watch a self fulfilling trend setter but I'd certainly be hesitant to give the device trend setting respect because of its (in my opinion conventional) innovation.