notices - See details
Notices
Enterprising Investor Default Hero Image
25 June 2013 Enterprising Investor Blog

A Bond Convexity Primer

Enterprising Investor Blogs logo thumbnail

As the US Federal Reserve lays the verbal groundwork for an eventual real-world quantitative easing (QE) taper, bond prices are dropping at an accelerated rate. In order to understand the ramifications of a Federal Reserve taper on the prices of a bond or bond portfolio, what is needed is a bond convexity primer.

In the parlance of those who know calculus, convexity is the second derivative. For the layperson this is known as the rate of change in change. For convexity to make better sense, let me compare it to driving a car. When you are driving a car your speed is the rate of change in the car’s location. Want to change your speed (i.e., the rate of change)? Then you either give the car more gas with the accelerator or press down on the brakes to slow the car down. Speeding up and slowing down are the second derivative. Speeding up means that there is a positive second derivative, while slowing down means that there is a negative second derivative.

Related to the bond market, the speed of your car is called duration, while the speeding up/slowing down is known as convexity. The higher the convexity, the more dramatic the change in price given a move in interest rates. Whatever you call it, after a while, if you keep braking a car it stops. After a while, if your bond is experiencing negative convexity, it also slows down/loses value. The harder the acceleration or braking, the greater the change in your speed.

So why is the relationship between a bond’s yield and its price known as convexity? As yields change, the change in the price of the bond is not linear; it is curved in a convex fashion. To understand convexity more directly take a look at the following three graphs, all for a $1,000 par value bond, with a coupon rate of 3.452%, making payments twice per year, and with zero expectation of a yield change in the future. The only thing making these three bonds different is the number of years until maturity — 30 years, 10 years, and 1 year.


Capital Gains at Indicated Interest Rate, 30-Year Maturity

Capital Gains at Indicated Interest Rate, 30-Year Maturity

Above is the bond with a 30-year maturity. Look at how curved — i.e., how convex — the graph of the price-yield relationship is! Notice also that there are no capital gains/changes in price at the exact yield of the bond, 3.45%, where the line actually touches the horizontal axis. This means that if yields stay the same as the coupon rate there should be no change in the price of the bond.


Capital Gains at Indicated Interest Rate, 10-Year Maturity

Capital Gains at Indicated Interest Rate, 10-Year Maturity

A 10-year maturity bond is graphed above. Look at how much less convex the line is relating price to yield. Again, note that the line touches the horizontal axis at 3.45%.


Capital Gains at Indicated Interest Rate, One-Year Maturity

Capital Gains at Indicated Interest Rate, 1-Year Maturity

Last, look at this one-year maturity version of a bond. There is zero convexity/curve, just a flat line. What all of this means is that a bond’s price is sensitive to the length of its maturity. But it is also sensitive to other factors. I have created a spreadsheet that aptly demonstrates convexity for a bond under different scenarios so that you can experiment with different combinations of factors to show you the effects of convexity on a bond’s price performance. Separately, I have also attached a spreadsheet from our fixed-income valuation course that allows you to calculate duration and convexity in a numerical format if you prefer to see it quantitatively. If you are not feeling experimental, here is a summary of the factors affecting bond convexity:

  • Maturity: Positive correlation; the longer the maturity the greater the convexity/price sensitivity to yield changes.
  • Coupon: Negative correlation; the higher the coupon the lower the convexity/price sensitivity to yield changes.
  • Yield: Negative correlation; the lower the yield the higher the convexity/price sensitivity to yield changes. To best understand this, look at the graph above for the 30-year bond. The lower the yield goes the higher the convexity/price sensitivity as compared with the higher yield portion of the curve.

I have kept things simple here. If the bond has embedded options, such as calls or puts, it will affect some of the above relationships, sometimes dramatically. Because every bond has a unique structure and issuer, it is impossible to dole out advice on the exact relationships. But because call and put options generally affect maturity you can make informed guesses as to the affect on convexity.

Another factor often not discussed in the price performance of bonds and bond portfolios is how rapidly changes in interest rates occur. The further into the future and the smaller the interest rate changes, the less damage done to a bond or portfolio today.

So, in an environment of central bank tapering, investors want low convexity bonds and bond portfolios. Such a portfolio, as rare as a golden goose, would have a short maturity, high coupon rate, and a high yield. Good luck finding that!

You can download the spreadsheets mentioned in the article here:

If you liked this post, don't forget to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.


All posts are the opinion of the author. As such, they should not be construed as investment advice, nor do the opinions expressed necessarily reflect the views of CFA Institute or the author's employer.

Photo credit: ©iStockphoto.com/Jitalia17

43 Comments

KP
Krishnakant Purohit (not verified)
20th December 2013 | 3:19am

Excellent write-up, you made it really simple to understand. I am slow learner, this really matters a lot to me. Thanks for the write-up once again

JA
Jason A. Voss, CFA (not verified)
20th December 2013 | 7:32am

Hello KP,

I am also a slow learner and so am doubly pleased that you found the blog post beneficial!

With smiles!

Jason

JD
James Douglas (not verified)
15th January 2014 | 3:16pm

I was a bit surprised by the abysmal performance in the step-up agency market during the most recent
move in rates. Would this be attributed to the rapidity of the move, and as such, should these securities regain their alleged defensive nature in a more gradual rising rate environment?

Regards,

JAD

JA
Jason A. Voss, CFA (not verified)
16th January 2014 | 10:23am

Hi James,

Thank your interest in the post and for the question. I must leave the answer to your question to the audience as we generally steer away from commenting on market or security movements at CFA Institute. Instead, we prefer to discuss tools that hopefully allow you to assess these things trenchantly.

Feel free to share your own views, too!

With smiles,

Jason

SS
Sandeep sarangi (not verified)
5th December 2014 | 9:03am

Thanks for the amazing explanation.

I have one question related to convexity if you can please clarify. The general convention is that bond with higher convexity are better because their prices rises more when yields fall and decreases at a slower rate when yield rise compared to a bond with lower convexity. Can you please let me know the underlying logic for the same.

J
jason (not verified)
5th December 2014 | 3:17pm

Sandeep,

The logic is this. Convexity can also be thought of as the propensity for the DURATION of a bond to change when INTEREST RATES change.

So, when interest rates go down, you would wish to have longer duration bonds (because they'll experience more price appreciation.) A bond with high positive convexity will indeed tend to increase in duration when interest rates decrease. So that's better for you.

A bond with negative convexity will DECREASE in duration as interest rates go down -- exactly the opposite of what you want. Therefore you get a worse price return.

What's really happening here is that the expected cash flows of the negatively convex bond change as interest rates go down (either through principal prepayment or calls.) That's why the duration decreases.

On the other side of the coin, negatively convex bonds INCREASE in duration when yields go up. So that's bad compared to positively convex bonds.

S
sahil (not verified)
13th May 2015 | 11:53am

Hi Jason,

I didnt get why the curve is convex and not straight one. what are the basic resons for the convexity if the curve. Please explain

Thanks

JV
Jason Voss, CFA (not verified)
13th May 2015 | 2:47pm

Hello Sahil,

The graph showing the relationship between the price of a bond and its yield duration with respect to changes in interest rates is non-linear, therefore it is curved. The reasons that lead to the curve are discussed in the article: maturity, coupon, and yield.

Duration, a sibling to convexity, is basically the time weighted average of when you get paid back by owning a bond. Because most bonds pay back principal only at the very end of the bond term, it causes a skewing of duration toward the end of the term. In turn, this skewing causes the curve to bend.

As alluded to immediately above, time causes bending, too. That is because of the time value of money. A rupee received today is much more valuable than one received in the future. The further into the future the payback of the rupee, the lower its value to you today in a normal world of positive interest rates. This makes sense, right? After all, if I borrow a rupee from you today and promise to pay it back in 1,000 years, my promise to pay it back has very little value to you. As the maturity is pushed further into the future this causes a non-linear effect on bond pricing today. Put another way, the 999th year of interest is not really that different to you than the 1,000th year of interest. That's because as you go further in time the value between interest payments diminishes. Compare that 1,000 year bond to getting paid back in two years. In this case, there is a big difference between this year and next year in percentage terms. Two years from today is 100% longer away from you than next year. Consequently, there is a bigger, more linear effect on duration with short maturities.

The next thing to understand is the spread between the stated coupon rate of a bond and the current interest rate. The wider this spread, the more non-linear the effect on price of the bond.

If you have access to a desktop computer, download the spreadsheets associated with this post, and play around with the assumptions so that you can see the effect of changes on convexity.

I hope that this helps,

Jason

S
sahil (not verified)
14th May 2015 | 2:03am

thanks Jason

M
Mike (not verified)
26th June 2015 | 12:06am

For those looking for a simply strategy that will deliver some alpha with the "inevitable" rate increases coming, go buy a NOB spread i.e. notes (10yr) over bonds (30yr). As the yield curve begins (continues) to steepen, everything explained above in this great article can be taken advantage of. Be sure to look up "current" DV01 for each futures contract so you can apply the appropriate notionally weighted hedge ratio.