To improve accuracy for estimating long-term expected returns, this study evaluates different estimation frameworks and input proxies within each framework. Analysis shows that using a three-component model can improve Sharpe ratios more than 50%.
Read the Complete Article in the
Financial Analysts Journal
CFA Institute Member Content
In Practice Member Companion Feature
View Brief
CFA Institute Member Content
Publish in the Financial Analysts Journal
Interested in having your article published in the Financial Analysts Journal? Find out how.
Abstract
Estimating long-term expected returns as accurately as possible is of critical importance. Researchers typically base their estimates on yield and growth, valuation, or a combined yield, growth, and valuation (“three-component”) framework. We run a horse race of the abilities of different frameworks and input proxies within each framework to estimate 10- and 20-year out-of-sample returns. The three-component model based on the TRCAPE valuation proxy outperforms estimates based on historical mean benchmark returns, with mean square error improvements exceeding 30%. Using this approach in asset allocation decisions results in an improvement in Sharpe ratios of more than 50%.