We're using cookies, but you can turn them off in your browser settings. Otherwise, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more in our Privacy Policy

Bridge over ocean
1 September 1983 Financial Analysts Journal Volume 39, Issue 5

The Tradeoff between Return and Risk in Immunized Portfolios

  1. H. Gifford Fong
  2. Oldrich A. Vasicek

The target value of an immunized portfolio at the horizon date defines the portfolio’s target rate of return. If interest rates change by parallel shifts for all maturities, the portfolio’s realized rate of return will not be below the target value. To the extent that non-parallel rate changes occur, however, the realized return may be less than the target value.

The relative change in the end-of-horizon value of an immunized portfolio resulting from such an arbitrary rate change will be proportional to the value of its immunization risk. Immunization risk equals the weighted variance of times to payment around the horizon date, hence depends on portfolio composition. For example, immunization risk will be low if portfolio payments cluster around the end of the horizon and high if payments are widely dispersed in time. One may minimize the extent to which a portfolio’s realized return differs from its target return by minimizing the portfolio’s immunization risk (while keeping the portfolio’s duration equal to the remaining horizon length).

Although risk minimization is the traditional objective of immunization, the immunization risk measure may also be used to optimize the risk-return tradeoff. The standard deviation of an immunized portfolio’s rate of return over the investment horizon will be proportional to the value of its immunization risk. Thus an investor may choose from immunized portfolios of equal duration a portfolio with a high level of immunization risk in order to maximize his expected return.

Read the Complete Article in Financial Analysts Journal Financial Analysts Journal CFA Institute Member Content