Bridge over ocean
1 January 2015 Financial Analysts Journal Volume 71, Issue 1

Why We Need a Pension Revolution

  1. Keith P. Ambachtsheer

A broad consensus exists that workplace pension arrangements around the world are sick and in need of strong medicine. Rather than resurrect the traditional defined-benefit (DB) plan or broaden defined-contribution (DC) plan coverage, this article argues that we move from an “either/or” to an “and/and” mindset to improve global workplace pension coverage, adequacy, and certainty. Pension arrangements can combine the best of DB and DC plans and minimize the impact of their less-attractive features. However, we must also redesign the institutions through which workplace pensions are delivered. The ideal pension-delivery institution is expert, has scale, and acts solely in the best interests of plan participants.

Editor’s Note: This article is adapted from the introductory chapter to the author’s book Pension Revolution(John Wiley & Sons), which is scheduled for release in January 2007.

Reprinted from Financial Analysts Journal, vol. 63, no. 1 (January/February 2007): 21–25. Author affiliation is accurate as of the original publication date.

Read the Complete Article in Financial Analysts Journal Financial Analysts Journal CFA Institute Member Content

We’re using cookies, but you can turn them off in Privacy Settings.  Otherwise, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.  Accepting cookies does not mean that we are collecting personal data. Learn more in our Privacy Policy.