Bridge over ocean
1 November 1984 Financial Analysts Journal Volume 40, Issue 6

South African Divestment: The Investment Issues

  1. Wayne H. Wagner
  2. Allen Emkin
  3. Richard L. Dixon

More and more U.S. cities and states are weighing legislation that would restrict public pension plans from investing in companies that do business in South Africa. Divestment has potentially serious implications for the investment policies and practices of large funds.

Consider what happens if each of the 152 South African-related companies in the Standard & Poor’s 500 is replaced by the largest “unrestricted” company in its industry. The new Alternative Universe amounts to less than 62 per cent of the capitalization value of the “old” S&P 500. Large multinational companies are replaced by smaller, domestic companies. The capitalization weights of some industries (including drugs, motor vehicles and product equipment) are more than halved. The Alternative Universe has 8 per cent more risk, as measured by beta, and 3 per cent less diversification than the S&P 500.

A pension fund restricted to this universe may expect higher trading and administrative costs inasmuch as its portfolios will contain smaller, riskier and less liquid companies. The larger the fund, the more likely it will have to restructure its plan investments completely in order to achieve targeted risk/return goals.

Read the Complete Article in Financial Analysts Journal Financial Analysts Journal CFA Institute Member Content

We’re using cookies, but you can turn them off in Privacy Settings.  Otherwise, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.  Accepting cookies does not mean that we are collecting personal data. Learn more in our Privacy Policy.