We're using cookies, but you can turn them off in your browser settings. Otherwise, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more in our Privacy Policy

Bridge over ocean
1 May 2000 CFA Institute Journal Review

New Facts in Finance (Digest Summary)

  1. Rajiv Kalra

Researchers' understanding of financial markets has undergone a tremendous change
during the past two decades. Researchers now know that stock and bond returns
are, to some extent, predictable at long horizons. They also know that the
capital asset pricing model does not describe well the return behavior of
several assets. The author surveys these and other new facts and suggests that
holding risk that is related to financial distress and recession can be
rewarding.

New Facts in Finance (Digest Summary) View the full article (PDF)

Great strides have been made during the past 15 years in researchers' understanding of
the investment world. The author examines these newly understood facts and shows that in
each case, price variables can be used to estimate expected future returns.

Until the mid-1980s, researchers believed that the capital asset pricing model (CAPM)
provided a good relationship between risk and return. Researchers now know that the CAPM
cannot fully explain why average returns of some assets, such as stocks of small firms
and value stocks, are higher than the returns of other assets. Multifactor extensions of
the CAPM have been successfully used to better describe the returns of these assets.

Most investors prefer to hold assets that do well during recessions because by doing so
the aggregate effect of a recession on their well-being is not as severe as it would be
with procyclical stocks. Thus, covariance with recessions matters in determining
returns. Other factors, such as size and the book-to-market value ratio, have been found
to be additionally priced risk factors. Interestingly, macroeconomic factors, such as
industrial production, investment growth, and inflation, do not explain size and value
effects well.

The concept that prices follow “random walks” and that risky returns are
unpredictable is still valid, but recent studies show that returns on stocks are
associated with business cycles and financial distress and are predictable for long
investment horizons. As in the case of bonds, a series of good past returns drives up
stock prices and results in a poor outlook for future returns. Stocks that do poorly and
reach a low price do well subsequently. Exploiting the small predictability of monthly
individual returns is known as a momentum strategy. The author notes that transaction
costs, thin trading of small stocks, and high short sales costs render a momentum
strategy essentially unprofitable.

The time-honored expectation hypothesis states that long-term rates represent an average
of future short-term rates and that an upward-sloping yield curve indicates expectations
of rising short-term rates. Recent evidence shows that the expectation hypothesis seems
to do a good job of predicting interest rates for long horizons but not for short
horizons. A high forward rate does not necessarily mean that interest rates will be
higher one year from today; it appears to suggest that investors will earn much more by
investing in long-term bonds.

An interest rate differential between two countries is expected to be associated with
foreign currency revaluation: The currency of the country with the higher interest rate
is expected to depreciate. Interest rate differentials on long-term bonds correctly
forecast changes in the values of currencies over the long term, but rather than
resulting in a higher depreciation in the value of the foreign currency, temporary
higher interest rates abroad lead to further appreciation in the foreign currency.
Researchers are still puzzled about why investors earn more by holding bonds in a
country with higher than usual interest rates.

Researchers have known for some time that, on average, actively managed mutual funds
underperform the market index. Recent evidence shows that the so-called value funds
underperform the market because they do not follow value strategies. Also, researchers
now know that the apparent persistence in fund performance is the result of persistence
in the underlying stocks, not the result of consistent stock-picking skills. Active
management continues to lack empirical support. Nonetheless, research shows that the
passively managed “style” investing earns returns that cannot be explained
by the CAPM.

The newly found facts suggest that investors can earn sizable returns by assuming risks
of recession and financial distress in addition to the risk associated with market
movements. Also, strategies such as value and growth, dynamic bond and foreign exchange,
and market timing based on return predictability can be rewarding.