Aurora Borealis
1 November 2001 Financial Analysts Journal Volume 57, Issue 6

Are Two Factors Enough? The U.K. Evidence

  1. George Leledakis
  2. Ian Davidson

Some studies in the 1990s documented that book value of equity to market value of equity (BV/MV) and the market value of equity (MVE) capture the cross-sectional variation of stock returns in the U.S. market in the 1963–90 period. Other researchers argued, however, that two other variables—the sales-to-price ratio (S/P) and the debt-to-equity ratio (D/E)—have more explanatory power for stock returns than BV/MV and MVE. The evidence in this article, from London Stock Exchange data, indicates that S/P and D/E do not entirely absorb the roles of BV/MV and MVE in explaining the cross-section of average stock returns in the U.K. market. We did find that S/P has significant explanatory power beyond the contribution of BV/MV and MVE, but the explanatory power of D/E is captured by S/P.

Read the Complete Article in Financial Analysts Journal Financial Analysts Journal CFA Institute Member Content

We’re using cookies, but you can turn them off in Privacy Settings.  Otherwise, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.  Accepting cookies does not mean that we are collecting personal data. Learn more in our Privacy Policy.